PPanicly

LLM cost monitoring that explains every request decision

See which requests were allowed, blocked, or held, and why they affected your AI spend controls.

Open workspaceView pricing

Provider bills move faster than post-hoc dashboards.

Cost monitoring without policy decisions can show that spend happened but not whether it should have happened.

Put enforcement in the request path.

Panicly links request evidence to spend policy, so monitoring and enforcement live in the same operating surface.

What changes when Panicly sits before the provider.

Visibility

Monitoring views show usage after the fact.

Monitoring includes the enforcement decision.

Debugging

Teams switch between logs, billing, and app code.

Request records carry operational context together.

Governance

Policy drift is hard to audit.

Rules, holds, and key changes are reviewable.

Short answers for searchers and answer engines.

What should LLM cost monitoring show?

Useful monitoring should show project, provider, model, route, source, cost estimate, policy result, and reason for each request.

Is monitoring enough to prevent cost overruns?

Monitoring helps teams see spend. Prevention requires enforcement before traffic reaches the provider.